It’s My Birthday and I’m an Eclectic Christian

Card

It’s My Birthday and I’m an Eclectic Christian
Brian Zahnd

Today is my birthday and the Benedictine Sisters of Perpetual Adoration in Clyde, Missouri made me a birthday card. On the cover of the card is a cross composed of the “Five Words” (Cross, Mystery, Eclectic, Community, Revolution) that I talk about in the second chapter of Water To Wine. And since it involves the Sisters at Clyde, let me share a little bit of the Eclectic portion from the “Five Words” chapter. It’s a nice story…

* * * * * * * * *

Over the years I’ve received a lot of speaking invitations, but I’ll never forget when I was invited to speak to the Benedictine Sisters of Perpetual Adoration in Clyde, Missouri. The sisters had read one of my books and were inviting me to speak to them at their monastery. I gladly accepted. Then they asked, “What is your fee?” I’ve never had a speaking fee, so I just replied, “What’s my fee? A meal and a conversation.” They said they could gladly do that. When I arrived at the monastery I kept smelling toast. It turns out the sisters in Clyde bake the Communion wafers for most of the Catholic churches in America. It’s one of the ways they support themselves.

So there I was at a Catholic monastery founded by Swiss nuns in 1874 that smelled like toast. I really don’t get nervous before speaking, but standing in front of forty Catholic nuns in a monastery was unfamiliar ground for me. I wasn’t sure what the proper decorum was for a Protestant pastor in a Catholic monastery, so I just decided to be myself and spoke on the topic of Christian forgiveness.

After I concluded my talk and sat down, the prioress asked if I would speak some more. I thought she meant would I come back and speak on another occasion and I indicated I would be happy to return. But the prioress said, “I mean would you speak some more right now?” That was a surprise. I’ve spoken in hundreds of “on fire for Jesus” churches over the years, but the first and only time I’ve been called back to the stage for an encore was in a Catholic monastery! I wouldn’t have predicted that. Since then Peri and I have become quite close to the sisters in Clyde. I consider them dear friends. But there had been a time in my life when a deep spiritual friendship with Catholic nuns would have been inconceivable.

Prior to 2004 I was a poverty-stricken Christian…and I didn’t even know it. My poverty was theological and it was the sad consequence of my arrogant sectarianism. By restricting my Christianity to the narrow confines of modern charismatic evangelicalism, I suffered from a self-inflicted theological poverty. I needed the riches of the whole church. I needed to be able to draw upon the broad spectrum of Christian thinkers and theologians, mystics and writers. I needed to become eclectic in my approach to Christianity. A Christianity that is sufficiently broad and eclectic liberates us from an arrogant and impoverished sectarianism.

In my youthful arrogance (the word I really want to use is stupidity) I effectively defined and limited Christianity to my kind of Christianity — a charismatic-flavored evangelicalism. As far as I was concerned, most Catholics, Orthodox, Anglicans, and mainline Protestants needed to “get saved” — which is to say, they needed to become my style of Christian. There were times in my twenties and thirties when I was particularly antagonistic toward Catholics and mainline Protestants. I thought Catholics belonged to the “whore of Babylon” and mainliners were all “liberal goats.” How egotistical! How stupid! I’m ashamed of all that now. I have repented. Which means I’ve called my former attitude sinful and changed my mind — I simply don’t think that way anymore.

Today my theological reading is pretty evenly divided between Orthodox, Catholic, Anglican, Protestant, and Evangelical writers. I want to help all kinds of people discover a vibrant personal faith in the living Christ, but I feel no need to convert my Orthodox and Catholic brothers and sisters to a Protestant version of Christianity.

From my vantage point I’ve come to think that Orthodox, Catholic, Anglican, Protestant, and Evangelical expressions of Christianity generally have the same amount of truth — it just depends on what areas of truth you want to focus on. Yes, I actually believe this! I honestly don’t think evangelicalism has a greater claim to Christian truth than Catholicism. It’s true that I’m not entirely comfortable with the Catholic view of Mary and the practice of a male-only celibate priesthood. But neither am I comfortable with the Protestant view of Sola Scriptura and the emphasis on radical individualism. Another way of saying it might be like this — we need the whole body of Christ to properly form the body of Christ. This much I’m sure of, Orthodox mystery, Catholic beauty, Anglican liturgy, Protestant audacity, Evangelical energy, Charismatic reality — I need it all!

Over the past decade I’ve learned to worship with my Orthodox, Catholic, Anglican, and mainline brothers and sisters; I’ve found it beautiful and deeply rewarding. If my circumstances were different, I could imagine myself belonging to any one of these branches of Christianity. As it is, I’m content with being an eclectic Christian…or perhaps an eclectic sacramental evangelical. I’ve found that within the wide orthodoxy defined by the historic Christian creeds there is room for a lot of different expressions of our shared faith. As I glance around my writing table I see twelve books on Saint Francis of Assisi, an Orthodox icon, an Anglican prayer book, and a volume of Karl Barth’s Dogmatics. I have no intention of surrendering any of these to the petulant sectarians who want to police such things.

When I was converted from sectarian to eclectic, I obtained a passport that allowed me to travel freely throughout the whole body of Christ. In my theological travels I have discovered a Christianity that has both historical depth and ecumenical width. Now I can’t imagine not being able to access all the great contributors to contemporary Christian thought. Orthodox thinkers like Kallistos Ware and David Bentley Hart. Catholic thinkers like Richard Rohr and William Cavanaugh. Anglican thinkers like Rowen Williams and N.T. Wright. Mainline thinkers like Walter Brueggemann and Eugene Peterson. Without them my Christianity would be horribly impoverished.

After my book Unconditional? was published in 2010 — a book on the centrality of forgiveness in the Christian faith — I began to receive a much wider range of speaking invitations. I spoke at the monastery of Benedictine nuns. I spoke to a group of progressive mainline pastors. I spoke at one of the largest Lutheran churches in America. I participated in a panel discussion with Catholic intellectuals in Lisbon. But not only did I speak in these different settings, I made friends among them. I was discovering how much I really like the whole body of Christ! I have no interest in trying to convert my friends from one expression of Christianity to another.

Do I think the Benedictine nuns should become Protestants? Do I think the Orthodox priests I’ve come to know and love should become Pentecostals? Do I think my pastor friends among the progressive mainline Protestants should become conservative evangelicals? Of course not! We need Benedictine nuns. We need Orthodox priests. We need mainline ministers. And we may even need a few eclectic sacramental evangelical pastors…or whatever it is I am.

BZ

(Thank you to Sister Ginny, Sister Paula, and all my friends at the Clyde Monastery. Your friendship has enriched my faith.)

  • Happy Birthday. 🙂 Hope you have a great day. Enjoyed this post. It sounds similar to the journey I find myself on. In 2004, I would have considered you a heritic and left some sort of anonymous troll-like comment. Thank God for age and maturity. 😀

  • Thank you, Sara. My thirty year-old-self would consider me a heretic. 🙂

  • Erik Stensland

    Thank you for this Brian! You have expressed beautifully our great need for the whole body of Christ. I wish this could be shouted from the rooftops of our churches. Wishing you a very wonderful birthday with friends and family!

  • Thank you, Erik.

  • Plain Faced Poetess

    As a beginning Charismatic to a likewise Eclectic I can attest to the same journey. Thanks for sharing.

  • Happy Birthday Brian!

    “When I was converted from sectarian to eclectic, I obtained a passport that allowed me to travel freely throughout the whole body of Christ.”

    This is it. This is what Christianity should look like.

  • “… This is what Christianity should look like.”

    Are we back to a more subtle version of “… my style of Christian”?

  • Cheri Brown

    God must be smiling. Yesterday I found “They Turned the World Upside Down, The Temptation of Christ, and On the Road with Jesus in Kansas. Thank you for re-starting some fires! Birthday blessings.

  • doug sayers

    Thanks Brian and Happy belated birthday.

    For what its worth, I have a similar story (although my eclectic tent may not be quite as big as yours). My first years in the faith were spent among the “Reformed” (Baptists and Presbyterians). You will be glad to know that I eventually wriggled free from Calvin’s irresistible grip. I trust you still include them in your eclecticity.

    A number of years ago I decided to get involved with the Gideons. I have since visited and made presentations in quite a variety of churches, in our area. I am happy to report that Jesus can be found in a wide variety of denominations and non denominations. But if I were to be completely honest, I would also have to say that I have been at churches where the traditions of men (religious clothes, angry self righteous preachers, dry lifeless liturgies, inane altar calls, vain repetitions, etc) have virtually relegated Jesus to the back row and threaten to push Him out altogether; but there are some real saints, even in these churches, that desire the Truth in love. Some of the institutions you list would not want to support the distribution of KJV and ESV Bibles so i guess the eclectic thing works in both directions.

    Would I be correct to assume that you think the Bible contains error? Would you agree that the Bible should be our final rule for faith and practice?

  • jon freeman

    Thanks Brian for your post! I am a new reader of your blog thanks to a friend who recommended you. This post resonates deeply with me as I have a similar journey to yours. I too have seem my arrogance. My narrow slice of evangelicalism has been broken open and opened me up to great love and mystery of God. The journey continues and perhaps your next step will be to find beauty and truth in buddhism, suffism, hinduism and other great religious traditions of our time. God’s grace and love upon all that you say and do!

  • Thank you, Jon.

  • Brian Cunnington

    Amen